Foreign Views

 

 
" There is still confusion about the cardinal point of the relation of Slavery to the War.  Lord Palmerston's organ, the London Post, says:  If the theory of the Government is to be observed, Slavery has nothing whatever to do with the question.  Of course that statement is meant to mean that emancipation is not the object of the war, which is strictly true."

From an article entitled THE WAR AND EMANCIPATION found on page 659 of the October 19, 1861 edition of Harper's Weekly

 
“The contest is really for empire on the side of the North and for independence on that of the South...”  

London Times  7 November 1861

English editorialists, writing during the war, also saw through the Norths hypocrisy- “They [the Northern white men] do not love the Negro as a fellow-man; they pity him as a victim of wrong. They will plead his cause; they will not tolerate his company

Slavery, Secession, and Civil War, Views from the United Kingdom and Europe , 1856  1865, By Charles Adams, Page 271

 

Or perhaps you prefer the report of Charles Dickens, who in 1862, reported on the observations of a French journalist. From private to general, “They took high ground, which appeared to them above all discussion or controversy. They have vowed to the North a mortal hatred, they will wage against it an implacable war, because the North has made an armed invasion of their territories, their native land; because they are driven to defend against it their homes, their honour, and their liberty. From the general in chief to the lowest soldier, everybody held the same language with wonderful unanimity.”        

  When in the Course of Human Events, by Charles Adams, page 12

 

"The flags of the Confederate States of America were very important and a matter of great pride to those citizens living in the Confederacy. They are also a matter of great pride for their descendants as part of their heritage and history."

Winston Churchill